Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus E3M-ET V5 SERIES  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170122
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 15:05
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 138
66% 106 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 184
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 39.7
35% 41 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 28.2
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 362 407 429 435 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 422
Mixed 389
SusWrite 398
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 41.9
127% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 291
233% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
294GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 108 114 114 117 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 148
Write 123
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 114
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75%
Great: 114%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
145GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,400
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 1.8
252% 352 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Mixed 0
700% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FDD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3M-ET V5 SERIES Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $126
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback