TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Notebook W65_67SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65_67SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SJ
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 04:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 79.4
40% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 192
21% 165 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 45.9%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 2
1% 6.33 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.1%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 111 33 29 33 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 455
Write 384
Mixed 360
SusWrite 64.7
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 17
74% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 39.2
71% 139 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.7%
 Great: 166%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
401GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 102
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 104
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 56.6%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33.1%
 Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SJ

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel  $46Bench 60%, 15,557 samples33x
Core i7-4810MQIntel  $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples23x
Core i5-4200MIntel  $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples14x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples55x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples45x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples1x
SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples4x
SSD 120GBGigabyte  $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples4x
RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 10,168 samples9x
CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,135 samples7x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,963 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback