Lenovo 20C5A02KME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20C5A02KME  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5A02KME
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 74
2-Core 146
59% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 411
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4281
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 6.06
3% 5.48 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 352 346 355 363 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 446
Write 364
Mixed 346
SusWrite 355
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 19
84% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 33.9
57% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
460GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 78 75 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.8
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 76.2
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C5A02KME Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C5A02KME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback