Notebook P870KM_KM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics66.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870KM_KM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870KM_KM1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 00:04
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 24
2-Core 46
29% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 82.1
8-Core 118
12% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0876) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.5% Good
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 107
59% 96.8 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 96
Splatting 105
82% 98.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 50 39 38 35 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 296
Write 216
Mixed 258
SusWrite 46
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 8.2
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 33.9
42% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29%
Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 306 333 326 328 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 405
Write 356
Mixed 352
SusWrite 326
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 16.9
57% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 120
88% 117 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 59%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 18.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870KM_KM1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870KM_KM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback