Notebook P870KM_KM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics65% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook P870KM_KM1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P870KM_KM1
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 23:36
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 46
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 41.2
25% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 73.2
8-Core 94.1
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0876) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65% Good
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 108
Parallax 107
56% 94.9 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 105
82% 99.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 30 22 37 15 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 282
Write 62.2
Mixed 65
SusWrite 30.2
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 9
30% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 308 315 329 326 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 380
Write 347
Mixed 334
SusWrite 316
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 16.9
56% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 101
79% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870KM_KM1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Notebook P870KM_KM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback