Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 14:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 592
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 4.81
4% 11.2 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 4
Splatting 9.26
6% 6.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 298 299 298 298 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,292
Mixed 481
SusWrite 461
211% 953 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 59.5
222% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 676
608% 923 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 206%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback