Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.2
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 279
85% 163 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 769
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 6
4% 31.8 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7
6% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1714 1683 931 381 233 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,612
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 856
306% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 70.6
245% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 978
744% 1,008 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 238%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 12.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V17.2 Builds (Compare 975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback