Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 173
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 290
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.04
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.8
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,887
Write 2,732
Mixed 2,791
626% 2,803 MB/s
4K Read 166
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 33.2
342% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 467
345% 457 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 116%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
153GB free
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 71 68 60 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.3% Very poor
Read 135
Write 53.9
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 64.7
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.1
25% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 102%
Kioxia-exceria S 960GB
399GB free
Firmware: 1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 396 384 197 108 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 454
Write 222
Mixed 338
SusWrite 262
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 24.8
96% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 93.5
92% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70
86GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 32%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
17GB free
Firmware: 0-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 62 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 74.3
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 63
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 42%
WD 10EZEX External 1TB
580GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 40.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 41.6
53% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.2
109% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback