Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 315
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.04
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 12.7
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,085
Write 2560
Mixed 3,135
791% 3,594 MB/s
4K Read 319
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 133
707% 184 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 692
537% 749 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 116%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
153GB free
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 277 263 266 257 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 316
Write 207
Mixed 254
SusWrite 227
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 27
93% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 136
137% 219 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 102%
Kioxia-exceria S 960GB
399GB free
Firmware: 1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 429 245 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 445
Write 398
Mixed 343
SusWrite 236
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 38.2
138% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 243
207% 302 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70
86GB free
Firmware: 3.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 48.3
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 47.9
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 32%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
17GB free
Firmware: 0-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 62 61 61 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 74.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 63.1
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 42%
WD 10EZEX External 1TB
580GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 50.8
Write 38.1
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.1
54% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
109% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 9905584-017.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback