TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 17:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 115
52% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 246
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 58.8%
 Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 1490) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2737
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10.4
9% 10.2 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 8.32%
 Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 330 345 395 387 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 298
Write 348
Mixed 298
SusWrite 345
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 17
76% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 162
153% 234 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 67.8%
 Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2133, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 45.5%
 Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples276x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples258x
Core i7-7500U VHIntelBench 52%, 2,074 samples24x
GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples406x
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples158x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples1x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples27x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples20x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples65x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBHynixBench 52%, 1,703 samples30x
8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GBMicronBench 62%, 307 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback