Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 17:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 221
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 1490) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2737
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 10.2
9% 10.3 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 12
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 344 350 395 437 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 366
Write 402
Mixed 335
SusWrite 375
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 30.1
109% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 165
155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2133, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback