Medion MD34862

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34862  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG Z490M GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C76)
Memory40.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 15:38
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 700
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 9509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 49%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 1TB SSD 1TB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.7.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,298
Write 1745
Mixed 767
284% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 388
351% 538 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 300%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
70GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,211
Write 1,453
Mixed 1,285
295% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 25.6
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 566
429% 580 MB/s
Poor: 183% Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.M8FF Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD CT16G4DFRA266.M8FF Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 25.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 26.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34862 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Medion MD34862

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback