Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-4455M APU 1,612 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 40.5 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 25 20% 27.5 Pts	4-Core 31 8-Core 23.5 4% 27.2 Pts	64-Core 26.1 2% 26.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500G 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C660) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.42% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 2.6 2% 3.47 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.42% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: S340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 141 143 111 135 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 137 Write 136 Mixed 123 SusWrite 129 30% 131 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 6.8 23% 7.57 MB/s	DQ Read 88.7 DQ Write 48.9 DQ Mixed 70.8 52% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TIMETEC-SD3-1600 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 667, 800 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 5.1 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-4455M APUAMDBench 32%, 1,612 samples	14x
A4-4355M APUAMDBench 32%, 426 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 7500GAMDBench 2%, 1,262 samples	14x
Radeon HD 7400GAMDBench 2%, 379 samples	7x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
Samsung M471B5673GB0-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 17%, 34 samples	2x
SH564568FH8NWPHSFG 4GBUnknownBench 29%, 37 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16