Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-DS4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 10:01
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 475
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 173
Parallax 184
129% 172 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 168
Splatting 118
111% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 229 233 194 230 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 236
Write 228
Mixed 197
SusWrite 225
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 30.2
100% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 43
38% 55 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 116%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
183GB free
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 385 347 273 275 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 471
Write 424
Mixed 284
SusWrite 330
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 33.9
116% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 207
176% 257 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 396 411 402 402 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 431
Mixed 416
SusWrite 400
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 36.4
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 233
183% 252 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 125%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$236
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 229 236 231 230 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 193
Mixed 102
SusWrite 234
131% 180 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
355% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 138%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$232
2TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 136 135 137 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 109%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 123 127 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 84.7
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 124
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68% Good
Read 131
Write 127
Mixed 102
SusWrite 106
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MG09ACA1 18TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 266 255 265 266 262 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 88% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5.5
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-DS4 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback