Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1235U 8,532 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 52.1 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 118 44% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 425 40% 332 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 18,007 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Legend(17AA 50A6) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.46% Terrible	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 9.3 10% 13.1 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 9.2 9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.46% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MGE1QDQ 256GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5Q0630 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 276 255 389 543 557 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 655 Write 565 Mixed 491 SusWrite 383 117% 524 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 28.4 98% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 226 157% 203 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 268%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 29.9 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples	4x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples	4x

SSD
RPJTJ256MGE1QDQ 256GBUmisBench 178%, 126 samples	4x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples	3x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 6,868 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16