Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 06:00
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 697
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
PNY(196E 1213) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 126
Parallax 117
95% 120 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 120
Splatting 106
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aireye S2 128GB SSD
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 192 196 185 174 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 496
Write 322
Mixed 313
SusWrite 201
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 38
126% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 140
147% 241 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 100%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$28
138GB free
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1166 888 114 101 114 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1601
Write 1,158
Mixed 1010
SusWrite 417
233% 1,046 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 37.8
159% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 472
374% 516 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 161%
Great: 228%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 464 408 245 206 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 465
Mixed 428
SusWrite 340
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 34.8
124% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
345GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 99
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 103
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4U08S681QMMM52-12 CL16-18-18 D4-3000 M4U08S681QMMM52-12 CL16-18-18 D4-3000 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 25
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback