Yanling YL-1900_4C2L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemYanling YL-1900_4C2L  (all builds)
MotherboardYANLING YL-1900_4C2L
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 40.6
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 43.2
23% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 84.6
8-Core 84.4
11% 84.5 Pts
64-Core 78.6
5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 64GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 90 89 50 42 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 247
Write 222
Mixed 209
SusWrite 86.8
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 25
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 125
99% 138 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical YL-1900_4C2L Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Yanling YL-1900_4C2L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback