Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 507 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Memory 12.5 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 43.1 14% 25.8 Pts	4-Core 68.6 8-Core 72.2 9% 70.4 Pts	64-Core 69.5 4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 64GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 99 85 47 43 39 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.7% Average	Read 221 Write 181 Mixed 192 SusWrite 85.5 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 19.8 70% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 121 94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 381 10% 381 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	3x

SSD
SKC600MS256G 256GBKingstonBench 93%, 190 samples	2x
SSD 64GBHoodiskBench 63%, 57 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16