HP Laptop 15-da1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8533
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 495
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 8533) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 7.6
0% 5.8 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 107 107 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 384
Write 354
Mixed 226
SusWrite 110
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 38
138% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 158
139% 210 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
594GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 74 65 69 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 45.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 69.5
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 45%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
17GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 8.7 15 13 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-010.A00G Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da1xxx Builds (Compare 1,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback