MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B12
MotherboardMSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 298
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,039
99% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 215
Reflection 204
Parallax 196
175% 205 fps
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
124% 141 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 801 790 838 803 806 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,397
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,706
SusWrite 819
382% 1,711 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 66.6
214% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 307
330% 582 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 245%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
759GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 2323 2159 2330 2305 947 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,409
Write 1,953
Mixed 2,003
SusWrite 2,064
474% 2,107 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 70.1
225% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,462
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 249
318% 609 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 328%
Great: 372%
Spcc Solid State Disk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 126 128 125 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 143
Write 137
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 125
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77%
Great: 101%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
226GB free
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 386 424 453 436 457 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
509GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 96 99 96 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 75.8
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 97.6
102% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 33.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 31.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) Builds (Compare 3,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z390 ACE (MS-7B12) - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback