Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 12:42
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 133
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 799
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
973GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 472 473 473 471 473 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 460
Mixed 438
SusWrite 471
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 51.1
166% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1336 1382 1385 1381 1321 1156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,146
Write 1,472
Mixed 880
SusWrite 1327
324% 1,456 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58
191% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 595
453% 612 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 254%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
561GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 472 473 472 471 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 456
Mixed 399
SusWrite 471
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 477 477 478 475 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 446
Mixed 435
SusWrite 476
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 50.6
164% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 116%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
474GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 477 476 474 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 450
Mixed 367
SusWrite 475
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 40.9
137% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 220 213 212 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 199
Mixed 142
SusWrite 215
256% 188 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.8
387% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 2.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 2
404% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$90
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback