Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 19:46
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 232
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 810
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$238
974GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 417 415 427 428 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 445
Mixed 421
SusWrite 421
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 49.7
161% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 976 991 747 821 1072 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 1,028
Mixed 907
SusWrite 915
245% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 51.7
155% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 395
334% 489 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 190%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
561GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 397 395 412 411 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 452
Mixed 383
SusWrite 402
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 31
120% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 385 382 403 401 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 449
Mixed 406
SusWrite 391
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 49.3
162% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
474GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 472 470 468 467 467 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 452
Mixed 339
SusWrite 469
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 38.4
129% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 219 210 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 202
Mixed 141
SusWrite 213
256% 189 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 2.2
387% 5.4 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.9
408% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$112
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $920
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $119Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback