Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 134
2-Core 262
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 813
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1016
63% 1016 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
974GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 418 417 417 417 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 442
Mixed 401
SusWrite 417
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 45.9
154% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 1184 1203 1199 1170 1027 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,020
Write 1,099
Mixed 772
SusWrite 1,160
280% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 55.1
183% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 593
450% 607 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 236%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
561GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 394 392 392 393 406 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 453
Mixed 399
SusWrite 394
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 379 377 377 378 393 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 447
Mixed 429
SusWrite 379
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 52
164% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
474GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 476 477 477 476 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 437
Mixed 355
SusWrite 476
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 40.2
136% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 353
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 221 212 213 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 200
Mixed 140
SusWrite 216
256% 188 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 2
398% 5.5 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 1.7
406% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$90
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $920
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback