HP p6730f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6730f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 00:50
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 114
49% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 172
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.6
17% 19.2 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.4
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 142 136 130 145 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 208
Write 190
Mixed 192
SusWrite 139
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 157
114% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 9B0D2C80 FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6730f Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6730f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback