HP p6730f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6730f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 21:50
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 104
42% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 180
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 555
Nvidia(10DE 0958) 1GB
CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 957 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.5
10% 13.4 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 12
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 160 128 153 149 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 219
Write 198
Mixed 195
SusWrite 147
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 23.6
79% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 161
119% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 9B0D2C80 FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6730f Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6730f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback