Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509DA
Memory14.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191011
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 116
55% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 267
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 14BF) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 5.8
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 512GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 364
Mixed 357
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 18.7
85% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 33.9
63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Adata 20GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 16.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DA_D509DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback