Xenta MS-7C52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemXenta MS-7C52  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 182
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 524
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 28
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 24
Splatting 14
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFGJ1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 239
Write 92.4
Mixed 344
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 35.6
131% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 142
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 78%
Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G2 80GB
70GB free
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 60 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 60.6
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 60.1
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
66GB free
Firmware: MA15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 85 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 60.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 84.2
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
34GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 28 29 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 115
Write 26.2
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 28.1
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-VK 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 18.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7C52 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Xenta MS-7C52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback