Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 00:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 175
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 680
59% 503 Pts
64-Core 1334
83% 1334 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 39 7.4 39 17 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 575
Write 34.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 25
34% 162 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 78%
SSD 512GB 512GB
300GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 146 12 14 112 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 485
Write 409
Mixed 338
SusWrite 52.1
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 10.8
92% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 15.1
69% 152 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback