Lenovo 10FH000KUS

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Lenovo 10FH000KUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30BC
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '22 at 04:48
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 197 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 339 43% 326 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.85 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.1% Very good	Lighting 87.6 Reflection 85.7 Parallax 79.7 71% 84.3 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 76.9 Splatting 69.3 68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 353 314 101 102 104 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 455 Write 239 Mixed 331 SusWrite 208 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 31.7 119% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 198 172% 254 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 466GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 127 127 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 126 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 69%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 46GB free, PID 6700 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 11 8.6 11 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 115 Write 72.4 Mixed 7 SusWrite 12.1 56% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V02D4L84GB5285282133 2x4GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.9% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 10FH000KUS Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FH000KUS

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	27x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x
Core i5-6600Intel $133Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	2x

SSD
T253512GB 512GBTeamBench 82%, 3,987 samples	3x
X300 256GBSanDisk $99Bench 79%, 2,341 samples	3x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5090KE68H9F2133 RMUA5120MB86H9F2400 RMUA5120ME86H9F-2666 RMUA5120ME86H9F-2666 16GBRamaxelBench 72%, 4 samples	4x
M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5143DB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 66%, 116 samples	2x
M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,041 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48