ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220701
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '22 at 02:20
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 3,953 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 174 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 700 62% 524 Pts	64-Core 1,385 86% 1,385 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490 4,568 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 90B8) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.26% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH12 128GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: N104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 129 148 122 144 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 384 Write 128 Mixed 224 SusWrite 132 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 29.8 85% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 98 DQ Mixed 188 149% 216 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 382GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 118 119 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 119 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 463GB free Firmware: 1H17 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 12,771 Mixed 99.5 4,603% 6,435 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.5% Above average	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 18.3 60% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback