| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | MSI MS-7994 |
| Motherboard | MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994) (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180621 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 20 '22 at 01:07 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | SRB-User |
| Background CPU | 61% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53%
Above average
|
60% 100 Pts
|
24% 191 Pts
|
12% 203 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 37.5 fps
|
27% 33.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 58 62 61 57 56 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
29% 133 MB/s
|
41% 12.4 MB/s
|
54% 81 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
512GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 114 112 109 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
150% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
57.1%
Above average
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
46% 86.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 877 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 184x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 95x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 72x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 131x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 97x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $178 |