Samsung 760XDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 760XDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP_760XDA
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 02:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11600H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
86% 165 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 742
74% 601 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Sanyo(144D C1A8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2686
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 59.7
52% 64.1 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 56.1
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1683 599 124 253 153 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,582
Write 1692
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 500
296% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 51.3
174% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 847
628% 825 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 184%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE M471A2G44AM0-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 13.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760XDA Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 760XDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback