Asus PRIME H510M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-A  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 15:06
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 257
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 870
91% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 124
Parallax 129
111% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.6
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 462 152 217 196 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 504
Mixed 649
SusWrite 254
152% 690 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 9.9
78% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 244%
SomnAmbulist 240GB
47GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 146 169 36 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 502
Write 184
Mixed 242
SusWrite 117
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 15.7
72% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 20.1
24% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 88%
Kingchuxing 256GB 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: 2011XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 40 38 38 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.06% Terrible
Read 14
Write 34.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 40.6
6% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 4.1
16% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 172%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
174GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 79.7
Write 87.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 90.1
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
81GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 48 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 47
Write 47.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 47.1
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27%
Great: 43%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
324GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 50
Write 41.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 75.1
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-A Builds (Compare 3,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback