Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results

Gaming 26%
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 24%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200121
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 15:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 223
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 636
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 34.9
20% 29 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 24.4
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 411 419 424 424 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 768
Write 559
Mixed 652
SusWrite 418
134% 599 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 83.6
275% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 845
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 517
448% 667 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 175%
Great: 264%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
870GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 131
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $159
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback