Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 12:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 293
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 58
Parallax 78.2
46% 64.3 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 40.6
42% 53.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 139 140 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 347
Write 143
Mixed 185
SusWrite 140
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 26.5
96% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 125
101% 142 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100
560GB free
Firmware: RA0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 97 98 99 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 102
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 99.1
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3H8GL16A8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback