Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 15:37
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 328 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 37.3 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90 12,565 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 367 Write 349 Mixed 320 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 38.8 125% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 41.9 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 57.6 50% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 728GB free Firmware: CC46 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 168 Write 142 Mixed 69.3 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
External USB3.0 1TB 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 216GB free Firmware: 0204 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 74.9 Write 65.9 Mixed 19.2 39% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 72%
WD Elements 10B8 750GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 396GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 59.1 110% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3H8GL16A8 2x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-HD3 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3 - $200

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	103x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	62x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	37x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	19x
256GB 256GBDst6256-ssdBench 44%, 25 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $525

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16