Asus H81M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-E (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 162 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 225 28% 216 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.8% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 78.7 47% 64.9 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 43.1 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 142 142 142 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 387 Write 144 Mixed 199 SusWrite 140 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 28.7 104% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 133 107% 151 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 107%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB-$100 3,609 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 560GB free Firmware: RA0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 98 100 100 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 90.1 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 99.2 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3H8GL16A8 2x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	223x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	176x
Core i5-4440Intel $79Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	143x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	208x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	108x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	95x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $548

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16