HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 17:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 485
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 22.7
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 418 426 443 402 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 438
Mixed 420
SusWrite 410
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 45.8
153% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 288
239% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
822GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 72.8
Write 78.9
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 70.6
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 63%
1TB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 24.4
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 29.1
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
166GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 153 153 150 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 118
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 152
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
724GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 196 195 195 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 158
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 194
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-442.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback