Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B75M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 00:02
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 188
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 513
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 58.4
51% 62.5 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 53.2
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 127
Mixed 109
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.15
72% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 10
Mixed 10.8
16% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.57
4K Write 0.51
4K Mixed 0.71
58% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT351U6EFR8C-PBHJ 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS R2.0 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback