Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory49.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 08:42
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 154
2-Core 280
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 791
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 31.4
20% 25.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 22.4
18% 21 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,064
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,695
447% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 37.8
130% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,163
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 728
533% 722 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 448%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 243
Write 264
Mixed 237
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 17.2
57% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 163
116% 142 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74
Write 107
Mixed 62.7
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Jmicron Tech 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0407
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 0.5
Write 21.4
Mixed 17.9
10% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 40.2
Mixed 54.9
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.7
Write 136
Mixed 68
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
28GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80
Write 23.5
Mixed 28.9
46% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
29GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 61.8
Mixed 50
102% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 4.9
396% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra 248GB
231GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 34.7
Mixed 37.6
72% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 BL16G32C16U4B.16FE BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback