Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '17 at 11:39
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 427 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% AMD(1002 1002) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.73 Parallax 2.97 4% 4.77 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 6.39 4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 11340308 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 35673998363648 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 712 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 121 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 45 90197262368 (C2) HDA temperature 32 45 90197262368 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11340308 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11340308 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11340308 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 60129542145 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4260 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2736 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2736 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4388 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2686990	56.8% Above average	Read 480 Write 214 Mixed 271 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 16.3 66% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 47.4 51% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 730GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 137 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3428 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9150 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3294 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 609 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 201721 (C2) HDA temperature 111 89 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 122 Mixed 133 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.21 104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GKE800UD51208-2133AH 1x8GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	115x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	68x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	34x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16