Asrock B450M/ac R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 14:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 764
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 832 843 838 840 843 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 1,741
Mixed 1,350
SusWrite 943
315% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 75.7
264% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 968
715% 947 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 244%
Great: 276%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
201GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 134 12 11 446 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 493
Write 456
Mixed 418
SusWrite 185
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 25.6
135% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 35.7
85% 172 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 30.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M/ac R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback