Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,272
117% 980 Pts
64-Core 2276
141% 2276 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
MSI(1462 3897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 118
Parallax 119
96% 118 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
97% 119 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 211%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$88
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 26.9
26% 32.1 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,138
Write 993
Mixed 848
221% 993 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 66.1
212% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1116
842% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
4GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 400
Mixed 320
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 16.8
96% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 20.4
78% 168 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
282GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2299 2175 1439 1432 1264 1279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,472
Write 2,273
Mixed 1,853
SusWrite 1648
463% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 71.1
276% 99.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,170
880% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 336%
Great: 410%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
834GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 82 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 90.4
Write 93.8
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 79.5
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
342GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 116 117 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 145
Write 111
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 114
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48A32-GIISMZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 29
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $672
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback