Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0DTR
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 102
51% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 164
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 92 95 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 434
Write 395
Mixed 330
SusWrite 129
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 195
162% 234 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
680GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 115 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback