TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire A515-56G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 249
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 537
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 69.4%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 2.2
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 6.8
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 7.32%
 Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar 512GB SSD
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 876 902 1042 1146 1134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,082
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 1,020
254% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 47.5
170% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 94.1
114% 203 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑
This bench: 180%
 Great: 364%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 82
Write 66.1
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 58.4
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 40.5%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Netac Co Ltd Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 18
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire A515-56G Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56G

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples626x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples336x
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples79x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples696x
GeForce MX350NvidiaBench 18%, 3,277 samples179x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples112x
SSD
HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GBNvmeBench 178%, 1,361 samples195x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples84x
KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GBNvmeBench 150%, 1,374 samples65x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples231x
ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GBKingstonBench 63%, 4,994 samples157x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 66%, 1,340 samples64x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback