Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 983 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 15:41
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 114
44% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 427
36% 310 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 89 103 78 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 67.1
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 69.7
62% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
309% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 78%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 1TB
999GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 154 194 140 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 112
Mixed 153
SusWrite 122
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.3
437% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback