MSI MS-17F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10UEK
MotherboardMSI MS-17F5  (all builds)
Memory31.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 691
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 116
Parallax 114
93% 115 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 78.1
78% 98.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88%
Great: 105%
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12A7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.2 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 13.3
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1266 1279 1340 1227 1008 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,232
Write 1,997
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 1,226
391% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 88.9
286% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 999
762% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 301%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
458GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 416 583 491 406 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.2
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F5 Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback