ECS H110M4-C2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H110M4-C2H  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 07:21
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 604
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Elitegroup(1019 9C56) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.3
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 132 63 92 64 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 409
Write 337
Mixed 302
SusWrite 116
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 29.5
125% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 170
150% 223 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
884GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 144 139 139 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 90.3
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 134
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2400U1704JY 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M4-C2H Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback