MSI Z97A GAMING 6 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97A GAMING 6 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 23:17
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 111
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 541
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 154
Parallax 144
117% 147 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 150
Splatting 129
111% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Rogueware M.2 PCIe NX200M 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 376 119 164 521 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 683
Write 613
Mixed 567
SusWrite 242
118% 527 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 25.2
136% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 316
268% 388 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 206%
Rogueware 2.5'' SATA NX100S 512GB
255GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 209 299 285 213 296 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 472
Write 425
Mixed 403
SusWrite 250
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 27.2
123% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 43.5
91% 180 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82%
Great: 96%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
333GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 222 322 309 228 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 448
Mixed 360
SusWrite 268
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 41.4
138% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 197
188% 295 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
554GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 163 168 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 168
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 162
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 65 65 67 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 119
Write 91.9
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 67.3
113% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
225% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 64%
Innostor Ext. HDD 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 126 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 122
Write 133
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 125
159% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 0420 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97A GAMING 6 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97A GAMING 6 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback