Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 482%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 618%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics396% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221006
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 21:38
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 210
2-Core 427
127% 244 Pts
4-Core 862
8-Core 1,706
152% 1,284 Pts
64-Core 3,853
238% 3,853 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 16
Parallax 14.3
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.2
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
396% Outstanding
Lighting 633
Reflection 607
Parallax 789
516% 677 fps
MRender 550
Gravity 581
Splatting 317
378% 483 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 396%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR409
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3219 3137 3165 2545 2702 2673 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,041
Write 3,536
Mixed 2,474
SusWrite 2,907
623% 2,740 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 66.6
222% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,718
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 405
440% 783 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 371%
Great: 530%
T-force 1TB 1TB
795GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 456 435 442 444 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 179
Mixed 340
SusWrite 442
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 36.1
136% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 194
152% 211 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWR480 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 231 226 232 223 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 217
Mixed 120
SusWrite 229
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 129%
Great: 141%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 59 57 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 98.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 60.7
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
375GB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 111 105 105 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 125
Write 108
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 108
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.7
264% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
14GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 112 113 110 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 140
Write 146
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 114
158% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 96%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
3TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 119 115 118 116 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 146
Write 151
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 120
170% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6400J3239G16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 72.5
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 70.7
204% 71.3 GB/s
SC Read 57.5
SC Write 80.4
SC Mixed 67.2
195% 68.4 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 198%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback